I can't believe that this site would be on anyone's "best of" lists. Eventhough it was just recently launched it's design and technology feel as if they are several years out-of-date. The site could easily maintain the classic and elegant style of the magazine and still be inviting. However, this site is lackluster and flat. There is nothing about it that makes me want to stay. The content is presented poorly, from the navagation to the compressed cloumns of the articles. Poor selection of colors,banner sizes,and typefaces fill the site. Add poorly organized sections to the mix and you have a site that is unattractive and unwieldy.
Submitted by jr_harrington on Tue, 05/15/2001 - 08:55.
Your disagreement is an agreement
with Anita Dennis's article. See http://www.creativepro.com/files/story_images/feature/12375.html.
Pamela Pfiffner
GM/EIC, creativepro.com
I have to disagree
I can't believe that this site would be on anyone's "best of" lists. Eventhough it was just recently launched it's design and technology feel as if they are several years out-of-date. The site could easily maintain the classic and elegant style of the magazine and still be inviting. However, this site is lackluster and flat. There is nothing about it that makes me want to stay. The content is presented poorly, from the navagation to the compressed cloumns of the articles. Poor selection of colors,banner sizes,and typefaces fill the site. Add poorly organized sections to the mix and you have a site that is unattractive and unwieldy.