Yes, this column is short on any real suggestions--those will come. In many ways, though, the concepts of "efficient design" are well known, and will be applicable to this new format. Perhaps others will chime in on this forum with some of thier own design priorities for mobile devices. And as with many new communication formats, some insight will only come from experimentation, which is what makes this exciting!
Submitted by GeneGable on Fri, 01/12/2007 - 03:49.
I'm seeing a growing use of content management systems. Does anyone know if they are portable to a small format?
Also, I've noticed that most of these CMS systems never allow you to totally delete anything. Sure you can "put it in the trash", but having seen two CMS systems, there isn't a way to empty that trash. I see this being more inefficient as the database will grow larger and larger with "trash". Anyone else seeing the same?
minimal visual communication ...
is ad for the small mobile devices..turning
the zen way to illustrate and speak !
welcome to this new way of saying hello to each other...
cheers..
How do we...
design for the iPhone? Details, please.
more info
I would also like to see some details of how to design for this format. Perhaps you can run some articles on that subject.
More to Come!
Yes, this column is short on any real suggestions--those will come. In many ways, though, the concepts of "efficient design" are well known, and will be applicable to this new format. Perhaps others will chime in on this forum with some of thier own design priorities for mobile devices. And as with many new communication formats, some insight will only come from experimentation, which is what makes this exciting!
Keeping too much information
I'm seeing a growing use of content management systems. Does anyone know if they are portable to a small format?
Also, I've noticed that most of these CMS systems never allow you to totally delete anything. Sure you can "put it in the trash", but having seen two CMS systems, there isn't a way to empty that trash. I see this being more inefficient as the database will grow larger and larger with "trash". Anyone else seeing the same?