Comments

Return to article
1

OOF women

Now I see, the OOF rendering of the women which are probably photoshopped into the picture looks extremely ugly. The photographer forgot to mention that fast prime lenses have the better bokeh, while the bokeh of a 105 mm macro lens is of less quality. As far I remember 20 years ago the slides of my portrait was stored for at least 7 years, therefore I feel 3 years are too less. As a potential customer I feel bad about a pro caring so much about his rights on the pictures. The package is expensive especially for the client, therefore I expect from the photographer that there are no hidden costs. The deal is right as soom both parties are happy with what they get or earn. Once a calculated price is exceeded, I as a customer feel very unease.

2

Depth of field example image

Says Solares, “I typically use aperture priority because I like really shallow depths of field,"
If the image above this statement is meant to show how aperature controls depth of field, then somebodies needs some photography help. It's obvious that the image was manipulated in software such as photoshop. How can the two women beso out of focus and the wall be so sharp?

Login

Login to post a comment. Not a member? Sign up here
Enter your CreativePro.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Forgot your password?