Creativeprose: To Upgrade Or Not to Upgrade; That Is the Question

We asked if you were going to upgrade to the Adobe Creative Suite 2, and you answered.
Written by Terri Stone on May 16, 2005

Related Reading

May Upgrade
A lot of my response applies to upgrades in general, not just CS2. The good news about upgrading is that I almost always get something better. I like to stay up-to-date for the reasons you cited (more efficient and/or creative features), plus I feel by staying updated, I get better technical support from the vendor, and I put my support behind the companies I believe are doing the best job.

This new Adobe upgrade has left me somewhat flummoxed. First, I have been a Photoshop and InDesign user since their inceptions. I have dutifully paid for upgrade after upgrade, finally culminating in a purchase of the CS Premium last summer. Now Adobe wants another $750 from me for CS2 premium without knowing how the Macromedia merger will affect any of these products. I'm afraid of being left out of the upgrade loop altogether, but I don't want to upgrade to something that may change again in a year resulting in yet another upgrade, possibly new products, and another learning curve. I don't have the luxury of getting all the latest and greatest technology whenever I want, as I am self-employed and don't have corporate, educational, or any other big-dollar backing behind me. However, I also already have Tiger [the latest Macintosh operating system] in hand although not yet installed. If CS2 is better with Tiger, than I certainly want to take advantage of that.

This is the most complex set of upgrades I've had to work through ever. I still don't know what I'm going to do. Hope that more information will become available that will swing my decision one way or the other.

-- Gini Cornila

I'm on a G5/OSX using the Premium CS for designs that take me from print to the Web in a freelance capacity. My wife is working with the same set-up although her focus is more on the illustration side so she also uses Painter in her work. She also teaches Illustrator. I use Flash in a lot of my Web work and am quite anxious to see how Flash will become more Adobe-like (a positive move) in the upcoming months (probably in the next 12 to 18 at the earliest -- CS3?).

Now to whether or not CS2 is coming to our desktop soon. This is going to be a tough one. Even though I'd love to dive in, I don't see it happening right away. At a cost of around $550 (current bizrate.com cost) it is nearly half of what I paid for the first CS and that was back in November (when I upgraded from my G4 - another $2,000). The upgrade features always sound so cool in reviews (you guys aren't much different), so who wouldn't want them? On the other hand, when all the programs are lumped into a larger suite it is more difficult shelling out that kind of cash when you end up using only one to three of the programs. We're starting to use InDesign (goodbye Quark) and GoLive is gathering dust since we use real programmers for the Web designs we do. Yet it was cheaper to go the Suite route than the individual program path. Now we're stuck buying upgrades for the whole suite. $550 is not a cheap habit to maintain every 12 to 18 months but that's what lies ahead for all of us. I'm sure once Flash becomes incorporated into the suite, the cost will rise again.

Ultimately, we'll give in to the market monopolized by the 600-pound gorilla from Adobe. Once the Macromedia acquisition is complete, not much stands in their way to overtake Quark. In the long run this may turn out to be OK, but for the daily user, an 18-month $500 to $600 upgrade does not come as a welcome but more as a necessary cost of doing business. With graphic design salaries being relatively stagnant for the last 10 to 15 years, it won't come easily.

My wife (who teaches Illustrator) is hesitant about getting CS2. The program has major shortcomings when it comes to going to press. I strongly agree. I just wish that some of these shortcomings would be brought to light by folks like Creativepro.com, MacAddict, and Macworld, rather than focus on the latest bells and whistles.

Don't get me wrong -- we love these programs, but to see shortcomings remain while new features are added makes me angry. There will always be new things to add, but make the expected features work solidly and intelligently and you'll get a stronger following from us users. I'd like to see the basics become rock solid. It will help in teaching what the program does and insure a smoother path from concept to print.

-- Zenon Slawinski, Zenarts Design Studio

To read comments from readers who will be upgrading, go to Page 3

1

I upgraded because

Since I am a photographer, and since CS2 has already significantly improved my daily workflow, especially in processing raw files, the upgrade, at its price, was a bargain.

CS2 all but eliminates two or three third party applications I was using.

While I don't care for the online "peering over my shoulder", Adobe does this to make money, and people do steal the software, just like they have stolen my pictures from time to time.

Frankly, I wish I could aford the protections Adobe has on their software for the pictures I regularly send off to cyberspace.

In the mean time, Adobe helps me make more money.

What else is there?

2

Will not upgrade to CS2

We (Evans Engineering, Inc. http://www.evanscooling.com) were once huge Adobe supporters but as they continue to release increasingly expensive upgrades, problematic activation protocols, software that is often bloated and buggy, new releases are avoided as long as possible. Adobe was nearly synomomus with art and creativity, however they appear to be looking more like business apps authors a la Microsoft rather than creatives with an artistic spirit and like minded philosophy. The irony of this situation, we once ran Paint Shop Pro (that had a nifty little thumbnail browser), Micrografx Designer and Quark. In the late 90's we jumped on board with Adobe – now in '05 we plan on putting aside Adobe and revisiting our friends at Quark, Jasc and Corel. My personal feeling is that Adobe is treating its' long time supporters and customers very poorly.

3

CS2 is great but......

Few questions, aroused when I downloaded the demo of Photoshop CS2.
Adobe is a big company and surely wants to sell and make money but I believe releasing an upgrade to CS that is not really 64bit, makes me suspicious. Windows x64 is here along with Mac OSX tiger, and the benefits from a 64 bit operating system are too great to be ignored with the dual cores coming out and the much better memory utilization (something that the Photoshop will benefit the most). So I believe adobe will call us back to pay for a new upgrade to CS 2 or 3 x64 before the end of the year. For now I will stay with the Photoshop 7.0.1 and Illustrator 9.0, because the company I work for upgraded a while ago to the CS, and it was a great disappointment to see that in order to use the long time and really expensive collection of true type fonts we had to stick with the older versions. Adobe decided to go Open type only and drop the TTF fonts. That might work well in the States and maybe some other countries using English but it are not much help for other counties. So the CS is just taking space of the hard drive 98% of the time and it is the CE edition with Greek support, but the thousands True type fonts we have in our collection are not functioning properly with it, only Open Type do. Maybe Adobe thinks that the customers of the English speaking world are enough for them especially if they release an upgrade every 6-8 months. Anyway the CS2 has potential and if we decide to upgrade all our fonts and ditch the True Type ones and Adobe releases a true x64 bit suite then I believe we should get rid of the Photoshop 7.0 or Illustrator 9.0, and move along. But I do not see it happening before CS3 or CS4.

PS: Sorry for my English but it is not my native language.

4

I upgraded the morning CS2 was announced

I spend so much time in Photoshop that I find the upgrade always worth it.

I know about the "big" features like vanishing point, but sometimes it's the little things that make the biggest difference on a daily basis;

1. I can now move a Photoshop window to my 2nd monitor (on my PC)! Boy this little feature is worth it's weight in gold on a daily basis.

2. Working with multiple layers now is so much easier, it saves a lot of time everyday.

Smart Objects are truly fabulous, I use them all the time as they allow non-destructive scaling.

Adobe Bridge is really very nice, it's like having Photshop Album integrated into the suite.

5

I upgraded quick

Being a single practitioner (well I do have a bookeeper), I need every advantage I can grab to work more efficiently. I use the entire Adobe Premium Suite profitably. I ordered CS the day it came out and was not dissapointed. Did the same with CS2 with the same results. Because of some of the revisions, I bit the bullet and bought the multi-program support pacakge because it includes "how-to". I'm not dissapointed with either purchase. My attitude is that if I can't justify upgrades with increased productivity, I need to change my way of making a living. My clients also know that I stay on the cutting edge of available technology and respect my investment. Most folks at the age of 67 don't do that. I consider Adobe to be a work partner and have very few complaints against the company.
That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
Joe Dempsey
http://www.joedempseycommunications.com

Post a Comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <div> <br> <center> <img> <h2>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.