Out of Gamut: (Almost) Everything You Wanted to Know about Sharpening in Photoshop but Were Afraid to Ask

In a rare departure from the realm of color, contributing editor Bruce Fraser leads us through a tour of his favorite image-sharpening techniques.
Written by Bruce Fraser on January 24, 2001

Figure 3 shows the "wrong" sharpening applied to each image. The head shot has crunchy skin tones, and the cityscape looks out of focus. The culprit in both cases is the radius setting, which is now smaller than it should be in the case of the Figure 3a, and larger than optimal in Figure 3b.


Figure 3a: Inappropriately sharpened, resulting in harsh skin tones

Figure 3b: An overly large Radius setting causes this detailed image to look out of focus.

Sharpening in Lab
A good many users like to convert the image to Lab (CIELAB), then sharpen only the Lightness channel. The idea here is to avoid unwanted color shifts. Frankly, I don't often run into color shifts caused by the Unsharp Mask filter, but in those rare cases when I do, I prefer a simpler, faster, and less-destructive method than converting to Lab: Run the Unsharp Mask filter, then immediately go to Fade Unsharp Mask on the Edit menu and set the blending mode to Luminosity. This produces a result that's visually identical to the convert to Lab, sharpen Lightness method, and it's less destructive to 8-bit-per-channel images, because it avoids the quantization error you always get when you convert 8-bit channels to Lab.

Layer-Based Sharpening
The Unsharp Mask filter is a powerful tool, but it has two inherent disadvantages. First, Unsharp Mask sharpens everything, including noise. The filter works by evaluating pixel differences, and it doesn't really know whether a pixel transition represents an edge that needs sharpening, a piece of dust, a scratch, a noise pixel, film grain, or any one of a number of other elements that one typically wouldn't care to sharpen.

The other drawback: Unsharp Mask is a destructive edit, meaning that the edits are burned directly into the image data. You can use the History feature to go back and start over, but you can't modify the sharpening once it's been applied.

Layer-based sharpening addresses both issues. The sharpening is applied by an editable layer, without affecting the base image. Here's a simple but very powerful technique for applying sharpening through a layer.

Start by duplicating the background layer, and set the blending mode for the duplicated layer to Soft Light (for a gentle sharpening) or Hard Light (for a stronger sharpening). Figure 4 shows the base image, and the image with a duplicate layer set to Soft Light.


Figure 4a: Unsharpened

Figure 4b: Set the blending mode for the duplicated layer.

Figure 4c: The duplicate layer with a Soft Light blending mode chosen

At this point, all I've done is increase the contrast by adding the Soft Light layer. Where am I going? Well, sharpness is a local contrast function; Unsharp Mask actually works by increasing the contrast along edges. We achieve essentially the same goal with our sharpening layer by running the High Pass filter on our duplicated layer (it's on the Other submenu in the Filter menu).

1

sharpening on just the lightness channel

My experience is that sharpening of the full RGB picture can interfere with the colours; this can be avoided by applying the unsharpen filter to the lightness channel only in Lab colour mode. As this requires a lot of mouse clicks I have programmed a function key to switch to Lab mode, select the lightness channel, apply the filter and then revert to RGB mode.
Edwin

2

Very good

This is an excellent essay on image sharpening.

3

Good article but...

Bruce, How about including a review of Nik Sharpener Pro in this article? Where does it replace Unsharp Mask and where does it complement it? Also, look out for typos and missing .JPGs--there are a few in this piece, e.g, figure 2a is incomplete.
Thanks, lad.

4

Re: Good article but...

Thanks for the feedback. We have a review of Nik Sharpener Pro in the works: Keep an eye out for it in the coming weeks.

You'll be glad to know that Bruce Fraser was not responsible for the typos you mentioned. We haven't found a problem with Figure 2a. If you continue to have problems viewing it, please let us know.

Again, thanks for speaking up.

Mitt Jones
Senior Editor, creativepro.com

5

Excellent

Excellent

6

nicely done

useful info for me, a comparative novice at photoshop.

7

Why a Radius Value Below One?

Would Bruce or anyone else please tell me why fractional radius values are used, since there is no smaller unit than the pixel and we are told to work at output resolution?

8

Solid explanations of fairly complicated subject.

Excellent article! Perhaps the best, plain-English explanations of Radius, Threshold, and Amount I've yet to come across. Will highly recommend this article to those trying to decipher the intracacies of image sharpening.

My only criticism is that the High Pass filter should have been defined and explained with equal clarity.

9

Excellent article

This is information that I am currently using and have a need for.

10

hot stuff

more-more

11

Outstanding feature - useful and clear

Outstanding feature - useful and clear

12

Sharpening

Usual helpful words from an expert Bruce Fraser.

13

A very useful treatment of sharpening techniques

I especially liked the clear explanation of spot sharpening techniques. This is a tip that I will use again and again.

14

Concise and very easy to follow and understand.

I wish all "how to" articles were this well written and useful.

15

Great article on the uses of sharpening

I have never quite known what to do with the Unsharp Mask filter and High Pass filter. But now, I know how to use these tools effectively on all or just parts of an image which is extremely helpful.

16

Concise, useful, understandable

As a scanning newbie USM was beyond me. This helped enormously. Thanks.

17

Out of Gamut: (Almost) Everything You Wanted to Know about Sharp

I am sorry to ask what may be a basic question for anyone who knows photoshop but I am a "traditional/Film" photographer who has been moving to digital (with great satisfaction I may ad) and who is learning the "trade".

In the article Bruce talks of painting the sharpening with a soft-edged brush and I got lost and was hoping that someone may be kind enough to explain.

Otherwise I tried the two pass approach and this is absolutely great combined with unsharpen. I am anxious to try the technique described in "Out of Gamut: (Almost) Everything You Wanted to Know about Sharpening in Photoshop but Were Afraid to Ask".

Thanks,

JT

18

Unfortunately, most digital

Unfortunately, most digital photographers have learned sharpening by fixed rules that specify exact values to use in Photoshop's filters, and therefore neither understand why professionals use the tools they do, or how they might be using them rightly or wrongly. Portrait and nature photographers have one thing in common: we hate seeing sharpening artifacts on large blocks of color. Any underlying noise in the image tends to bubble up to visible, and skies or skin tones with too much detail in them don't look as good as gently gradated ones.

Post a Comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <div> <br> <center> <img> <h2>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.