QuarkXPress 6.0: A Safe Upgrade in Dangerous Times

QuarkXPress's perch on top of the page-layout heap has long been undisputed. But with increased competition from InDesign, the pressure is on Quark to produce an upgrade that secures its standing. Does QuarkXPress 6.0 deliver? Gene Gable reviews the Mac OS X version of XPress.
Written by Gene Gable on July 8, 2003

Related Reading

Layout Spaces
The most interesting new thing about XPress 6.0 is a simple idea that mimics the way many of us organize our work currently. It's called layout spaces, and all it really means is that individual documents (which are now called "layout spaces"), are held together in a "project" which is a like a giant über folder. So, let's say you are preparing a business card, brochure, Web site and catalog for Acme Industries. Whether they share common elements or not, you can open a project called Acme Industries and start individual "layout spaces" for each of those documents just as you created individual Quark files in the past. When you open the Acme Industries project file, you get all the documents (layouts) represented in tabs across the bottom of the XPress window (see Figure 3). This makes moving between items extremely easy, so if you make a change on one item, you can quickly update the other documents as well, though you have to do most changes manually on each document.

Figure 3: At the bottom of the document window, you'll see new layout tabs -- these show all the documents contained in the XPress project file. You can also see that the formatting palette has gotten bigger and taken on the Aqua look.

The most intriguing benefit of this new project orientation is that you can now link text within a project across multiple documents. So when Acme Industries changes the description of one of its products, you can update it across multiple layouts. I'll talk more about text synchronization in a minute.

A project can contain as many as 25 document layout spaces, and each document can contain up to 2,000 pages. But since you cannot build indexes or table of contents across layouts, this feature has limited use in building individual book chapters.

Since output or printing is done on a layout-by-layout basis, each document in a project file can have different output specs depending on where it's being printed, or in the case of a Web layout space, where it is being posted. You cannot print Web layouts directly from XPress, however, they are exported as HTML and printed from the browser, which has distinct limitations.

The implementation of these multiple layouts within one document is extremely basic, and you can't help but wish there was more you could do with them. You cannot view layouts in multiple windows or in side-by-side thumbnails -- only by clicking on the tab can you bring that document window to the front. So copying and pasting things from one layout to another is through the clipboard instead of by dragging items, and you can't display one page as a reference while working on another page. Sadly too, you cannot check spelling or use the Find/Change feature across entire projects -- only within individual layouts. And not being able to share document preferences across layouts creates extra work.

While I think this new project idea is probably a good one, it would have been better to have the option of saving out individual files -- every file is a project, even if it contains only one document. And if you screw up or experience a file corruption for any reason, all of the documents in the project will be lost.

Synchronizing Text
This will likely be the most appreciated new feature in XPress, and while not a complex database-driven content management system, it brings to every user the ability to link common text elements across multiple documents (and multiple media) in a simple and easy manner. By clever linking, a savvy user will be able to considerably streamline the production process and save hours of time in building repetitive documents and making revisions.

Synchronized text actually exists in a layout-independent space called the Synchronized Text palette, sort of like a well-organized clipboard of text boxes (see Figure 4). You type the text in any of the places it will appear, then click to name it and add the content of that text box to the palette. You can only copy the entire content of a text box, so I suspect people will be making more boxes with less copy in them. Drag the file name from the menu to any textbox on any document and the same text will flow to the new text box specifications. Text changes (not formatting ones) made in any of the linked boxes make the change globally in all links.

Figure 4: The Synchronized Text palette is where you store and insert text that will be synchronized throughout the document. You can see all the usages of any synchronized text box in a list, but you can't navigate to each use through the palette. Once text boxes are synchronized, changes made in any of the boxes makes the changes in all the linked boxes.

I was able to figure out how to synchronize and de-synchronize text without having to look in the manual -- the icons are pretty intuitive, if only because of the big S in the middle. This is a classic XPress implementation -- you build a list and drag from it, much like the Color palette or the Style Sheet palette. Again, if Quark had allowed side-by-side viewing, then there may have been a way to implement synchronized text by visually connecting text boxes from one layout to another, bypassing the palette. If you have multiple synchronized text boxes on a single page, keeping track of what's synchronized to what has no visual representation.

You can store any block of text you want in the synchronized text palette, even if it isn't used in any of the individual documents (though you have to author it at some point in a normal XPress text box). So this new feature can become a good place to store text that is cut from a document when you know very well it may come back. Or if you have several versions of common text, you can name each one and store them in the synchronized text palette where they appear as a list. By storing only text, not formatting, this feature is very handy. Too bad there isn't a way to view the contents of each item in the list without pouring the text into an actual layout -- a pop-up, interactive word-processing window would have made this feature even better.

You can unlink text globally in the project or on an individual document level, and text that is linked has special markers on the text box to indicate it is linked. You can also see a list of where all instances of linked text are used, but you cannot click to them through that palette. This makes checking the global effects of any change a manual job -- you'll have to navigate to each instance of use. Text cannot be synchronized between different project files, only between layouts within a single project. You cannot synchronize pictures or text blocks that have anchored objects, an oversight.

1

Downgrade to 6.0...

Let me get this straight:

- a crippling activation scheme (I have copies of all my software and workfiles on a bootable external firewire drive. That way, if my main drive dies, I'm up and running in a few minutes. If I need to go work somewhere, I just pick up my drive, boot form it on whatever machine I'm handed and I have all my stuff, fonts, preferences, etc. I even work that way on the laptop! Seems Quark doesn't want me to work that way...)
- publish and subscribe is gone (major, major bummer!)
- can't save to version 4.0 (Ooo! Shades of Microsoft circa '95: "Resistance is futile! You will be assimilated!" My main clients request 4.0 files, and I don't see them upgrading soon 'coz there's nothing in it for them...)

And they call it an upgrade? Sounds like a downgrade to me! Don't get me wrong, the idea of ditching classic sounds mighty sweet, but I don't see 6.0 working for me. Maybe I'll start toying around with InDesign again.

2

Quark and Customers

While the article may be accurate as a review, the fact is that Quark is once again taking a cavalier attitude towards customers.

Despite claiming publicly that 6.0 was shipping, the reality is that as recently as July 16, they are back-ordered and say it will be "20-30 days, maybe longer" before orders placed and paid for in June are filled.

This is a constantly changing date--two weeks ago, orders were expected to go out in "a week or so," so there is no reason to believe this latest date.

3

Activation woes Quark insanity

As a production person using Quark and InDesign on a daily basis I have serious problems with Quarks Activation ( I am still waiting to have it correctly activated) Quark 6 as a software program for the output of pages works perfectly fine but the activation thing is just plain madness it does not work as it should (ie first time) I have tried the internet option the phone and am now trying the emailing of the activation codes to quark after i had to fax the details to them (yes very hi tech). Once I have the program up and running it is fine however Quark need to wake up seriously if they are to remain at the top of the game they have to cop on that they are taking serious liberties with their customer loyalty. By the way we are now able to get more work from agencies as the designers are far more comfortable with InDesign than they are with Quark. Also an issue that my brother a trainee graphic designer has brought to my attention is that InDesign while it may lack serious inroads in the production field is making serious inroads in the creative agency area and the point is that at the end of the day is that our work comes from designers at the end of the day and they will go to companies that are using their software and can produce the artwork that they have created the way they want it to appear. I don't like the idea of Adobe ruling the world either but Quark are damaging themselves irrepairably in way that they are behaving towards their customers creative and production based.

4

Quark is second place to InDesign

I agree with most of this article, however, I can clearly see Adobe Indesign is leaving Quark in the dust in many, many ways. Best of all is that InDesign is less expensive than Quark to buy or upgrade. Spend less and get more with Indesign. Quark pdf features are a joke as well as attempting to make Quark a web tool. Quark is just too Quarky --- Go for InDesign. You will be much happier and much more satisfied with more cash left in your pocket.

5

Publish and Subscribe

This is mentioned very briefly in "What's Not There," and Sandee below is right--it will be a much missed feature. Hopefully this will be addressed in a third-party XTension. But compatibility with Adobe products like Photoshop and Illustrator is certainly one of the benefits of InDesign.

6

Quark Xpress is the standard

Love it or hate it, Quark is the standard. When it comes to reliable output, I still don't think much surpasses it, although InDesign may be getting there.
There are 2 things about the article that come to mind, one is the choices that an OS 9 using shop has, and OSX and Quark. Gene hit the nail on the head concerning choices that users have at this juncture in time. I came real close to abandoning my Mac based workflow, especially because all of the major software I need to function is available cross-platform. Instead, I've decided to continue on with a new (G4) Mac, going to an OSX machine and using Quark 6 and InDesign 2.
I agree with the comment about Tim Gill and the direction of the company, I think it has lost it's soul. I've been really fortunate in my dealings with Quark, when we were members of Service Plus, they always treated me well, especially during the 4.00 release disaster. I can't believe it has taken them this long to release something for OSX. Maybe they thought the same thing I thought, if the software is essentially the same on both platforms, why develop for the tiny market share on the Mac? Am I the only Mac user who feels like the poor relation when it comes to software?
Time will tell how well Quark 6 succeeds, I hope they take a clue from Adobe and throw in a few things for the faithful who have been using the software long-term.

7

No Publish and Subscribe editing of placed images

I've looked through the article and can't find mention of the missing feature that allowed you to edit a placed image in a program such as Photoshop or Illustrator.

This has to do with the fact that Quark 4 and 5 used the ancient Publish and Subscribe code to open placed images and then update them in the program.

Without this, Quark 6 has no way to launch the editing program, and then update the placed image.

This is a feature service bureaus and designers use all the time. Without it, the program is really crippled.

Post a Comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <div> <br> <center> <img> <h2>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.