Hot Stuff

Weekly Contest
FREE AKVIS Sketch!
CreativePro.com Podcast
Don't miss it! Updated every Monday.
FREE Mags for Creative Pros!
Creativity, Website Magazine, and more!
QuarkXPress 6.0: A Safe Upgrade in Dangerous Times
QuarkXPress's perch on top of the page-layout heap has long been undisputed. But with increased competition from InDesign, the pressure is on Quark to produce an upgrade that secures its standing. Does QuarkXPress 6.0 deliver? Gene Gable reviews the Mac OS X version of XPress.
Written by Gene Gable on July 8, 2003
Related Articles
- Page Layout Tips: InDesign Techniques for QuarkXPress Users
- Creative Analysis: The Impact of QuarkXPress 6
- The Digital Dish: Looking for QuarkXPress 6
- The Art of Business: Gene Gable on Design Certification, Letterpress Printing, and QuarkXPress Training
- For Position Only: Switch to InDesign or Stick with QuarkXPress?
Related Reading
Multiple Undo
Quark is late to the picnic on this one, but it finally got there. You can now undo up to 30 actions by several methods including undo and re-do buttons that appear at the bottom of the project window. In addition to the multiple undo capabilities, Quark has added new actions that can be undone, like, Get Picture, Crop to Box, and certain layers features. But not all items can be undone (like adding guides and some master page changes, and the Get Text command), so this isn't a foolproof feature. But after putting up with a puny one-level undo for so long, even a less-than-perfect tool looks like manna from heaven.
There is an undo history pop-up menu that appears when you click and hold the undo icon (see Figure 5). This tracks the undos and acts as a navigation tool should you wish to go back to a certain step. This allows you to undo multiple actions (but only sequentially). XPress empties the undo history when you close the document, but saving the document along the way does not disrupt the undo history. Redos are also handled in a pop-up menu, so you can redo multiple successive actions. But the labels Quark uses for these menus are pretty simplistic and may not tell you enough to pinpoint a specific action.
Figure 5: Multiple undo and redo actions are available through simple buttons (as shown by the arrows) or by bringing up a pop-up menu that lists all previous actions. However, the descriptions of these action are rather simplistic, and not terribly helpful as a navigation aid.
Sadly, Quark is beginning to suffer from the "too-many-palettes-and-menus-syndrome" that has cluttered our workspace and is one of the more intimidating things you notice when you first open InDesign. But of course you can turn them all off if you want and work with keyboard or menu commands in most cases.
Enhanced Tables
You're either a person who uses tables extensively, or you hate them and avoid them at all costs. I'm afraid I fall into the latter category, so some of these improvements are hard for me to judge. The Table Tool was added in version 5.0, which gave very basic table capabilities -- a far cry from the advanced table features (extensive enough to be a menu item) of InDesign. In 6.0 you can now link text cells in a table to any text box in an XPress layout and you can link cells to one another. You can also set the tab order of cells, and there are some improvements to the way you format table elements (see Figure 6). It is also now possible to convert tables to a group, and to apply clipping settings and other specifications to a picture imported into a picture cell within a table.
Figure 6: Tables are improved in 6.0, but still considerably behind those of InDesign. Here the Table Properties dialog box asks for only the most basic information. The table creation tool is the multi-boxed item highlighted in the toolbar.
But you cannot flow tables across multiple pages, or import tables from Microsoft Word and Excel (as most table are created in these programs, this is an essential feature and one that InDesign has). And the alternating pattern options Adobe built into InDesign tables is sorely missed here, as is the option of splitting cells horizontally and vertically. Power table users will surely be disappointed with XPress 6.0.
Improved Layers
XPress introduced the layers palette in version 5.0, which allows the grouping of objects into separate layers. Each layer can then be locked, suppressed, hidden, merged, printed, or arranged in front of or behind other layers. This gives you a lot of flexibility in making multiple versions of a document, for example, and brings to XPress the capabilities we've grown accustomed to in Adobe products for many years. Neither company allows you to change a layer's name without opening a dialog box, but they both allow you to delete all unused layers with one click. Unfortunately, you cannot share layers across layout spaces.
In version 6.0, the options for printing various layers has been improved, and you can now firmly lock a layer so that no changes can be made, regardless of the locking status of each individual item on that layer (see Figures 7 and 8). You can also easily select all items on a layer through the layers palette context menu and make global changes.
Figure 7: Layers are well executed in XPress, and can be locked, suppressed, merged, etc. through the Layers palette. But you cannot copy layers between documents in a project.

Figure 8: You can choose to print only certain layers right in the print-dialog box, which is handy for proofing and versioning.
By combining synchronized text and multiple layers, designers can create much more flexible documents of the kind that change often or have multiple versions. I think Quark missed some innovative interface options, though, that might have broken new ground in how we visualize the interconnectivity of versioned and linked text.











Downgrade to 6.0...
Let me get this straight:
- a crippling activation scheme (I have copies of all my software and workfiles on a bootable external firewire drive. That way, if my main drive dies, I'm up and running in a few minutes. If I need to go work somewhere, I just pick up my drive, boot form it on whatever machine I'm handed and I have all my stuff, fonts, preferences, etc. I even work that way on the laptop! Seems Quark doesn't want me to work that way...)
- publish and subscribe is gone (major, major bummer!)
- can't save to version 4.0 (Ooo! Shades of Microsoft circa '95: "Resistance is futile! You will be assimilated!" My main clients request 4.0 files, and I don't see them upgrading soon 'coz there's nothing in it for them...)
And they call it an upgrade? Sounds like a downgrade to me! Don't get me wrong, the idea of ditching classic sounds mighty sweet, but I don't see 6.0 working for me. Maybe I'll start toying around with InDesign again.
Quark and Customers
While the article may be accurate as a review, the fact is that Quark is once again taking a cavalier attitude towards customers.
Despite claiming publicly that 6.0 was shipping, the reality is that as recently as July 16, they are back-ordered and say it will be "20-30 days, maybe longer" before orders placed and paid for in June are filled.
This is a constantly changing date--two weeks ago, orders were expected to go out in "a week or so," so there is no reason to believe this latest date.
Activation woes Quark insanity
As a production person using Quark and InDesign on a daily basis I have serious problems with Quarks Activation ( I am still waiting to have it correctly activated) Quark 6 as a software program for the output of pages works perfectly fine but the activation thing is just plain madness it does not work as it should (ie first time) I have tried the internet option the phone and am now trying the emailing of the activation codes to quark after i had to fax the details to them (yes very hi tech). Once I have the program up and running it is fine however Quark need to wake up seriously if they are to remain at the top of the game they have to cop on that they are taking serious liberties with their customer loyalty. By the way we are now able to get more work from agencies as the designers are far more comfortable with InDesign than they are with Quark. Also an issue that my brother a trainee graphic designer has brought to my attention is that InDesign while it may lack serious inroads in the production field is making serious inroads in the creative agency area and the point is that at the end of the day is that our work comes from designers at the end of the day and they will go to companies that are using their software and can produce the artwork that they have created the way they want it to appear. I don't like the idea of Adobe ruling the world either but Quark are damaging themselves irrepairably in way that they are behaving towards their customers creative and production based.
Quark is second place to InDesign
I agree with most of this article, however, I can clearly see Adobe Indesign is leaving Quark in the dust in many, many ways. Best of all is that InDesign is less expensive than Quark to buy or upgrade. Spend less and get more with Indesign. Quark pdf features are a joke as well as attempting to make Quark a web tool. Quark is just too Quarky --- Go for InDesign. You will be much happier and much more satisfied with more cash left in your pocket.
Publish and Subscribe
This is mentioned very briefly in "What's Not There," and Sandee below is right--it will be a much missed feature. Hopefully this will be addressed in a third-party XTension. But compatibility with Adobe products like Photoshop and Illustrator is certainly one of the benefits of InDesign.
Quark Xpress is the standard
Love it or hate it, Quark is the standard. When it comes to reliable output, I still don't think much surpasses it, although InDesign may be getting there.
There are 2 things about the article that come to mind, one is the choices that an OS 9 using shop has, and OSX and Quark. Gene hit the nail on the head concerning choices that users have at this juncture in time. I came real close to abandoning my Mac based workflow, especially because all of the major software I need to function is available cross-platform. Instead, I've decided to continue on with a new (G4) Mac, going to an OSX machine and using Quark 6 and InDesign 2.
I agree with the comment about Tim Gill and the direction of the company, I think it has lost it's soul. I've been really fortunate in my dealings with Quark, when we were members of Service Plus, they always treated me well, especially during the 4.00 release disaster. I can't believe it has taken them this long to release something for OSX. Maybe they thought the same thing I thought, if the software is essentially the same on both platforms, why develop for the tiny market share on the Mac? Am I the only Mac user who feels like the poor relation when it comes to software?
Time will tell how well Quark 6 succeeds, I hope they take a clue from Adobe and throw in a few things for the faithful who have been using the software long-term.
No Publish and Subscribe editing of placed images
I've looked through the article and can't find mention of the missing feature that allowed you to edit a placed image in a program such as Photoshop or Illustrator.
This has to do with the fact that Quark 4 and 5 used the ancient Publish and Subscribe code to open placed images and then update them in the program.
Without this, Quark 6 has no way to launch the editing program, and then update the placed image.
This is a feature service bureaus and designers use all the time. Without it, the program is really crippled.