Scanning Around With Gene: Seventies Era Type and Typesetting

1

My favorite type era is definitely the Seventies, which I’ve written about before here and here.

It’s not just the popular styles of the era that I like, but the way type was set back then seemed, well, different. For one thing, type tended to be set much tighter than it is today, with letter spacing a rare exception, and overlapping characters more the norm.

And because much of the display type was set by hand either on a machine like the PhotoTypositor, or by using dry-transfer lettering, graphic designers were more experimental, looking at each character as a distinct piece of the puzzle. And even though with OpenType we now have more potential for alternate characters, they are rarely used these days. In the Seventies, swash characters and other alternates were very popular and were a way for a designer to put a distinct mark on how the words were set. Today’s images pick up where we left of last week and all come from various issues of Better Homes and Garden magazines dated 1970 to 1974. I’ve thrown in a few images just for fun to capture that Seventies style. Click on any image for a larger version.

Of course the Seventies were a colorful decade on many levels – men wore moustaches, women wore peasant dresses, sideburns were all the rage and appliances came in Harvest Gold and Avacado.

And type tended toward the big, bold and ornate. Here are two of the more popular styles of the time, Pump and Revue. Note the way the designer connected the lower case d and the upper case R. This kind of customization was easy when using dry transfer type and a Rapidograph pen.

Of course many styles popular in the Seventies were designed in previous decades, but thanks to distribution by companies like Letraset, they became more widely available then, so they got used more. Bookman swash is a great example. It was everywhere there for a few years.

And more ornate Sixties and Seventies-style designs were trendy, like Octopus Shaded, ITC Neon and ITC Pioneer.

Designers were experimenting more with type effects, too, which were not that easy to achieve back then, but hand-modifying type was not that unusual. People do that now in Illustrator and Photoshop, I suppose, but it isn’t quite the same.

There wasn’t anywhere near the selection of type we have today back then and when a design became popular, it was often over used quickly. That was certainly the case with Souvenir, Serif Gothic and Busorama.

You can see that type tended to be set very tight back then, with characters often touching or even over lapping.

I suppose it’s because I first learned about type during this period (well, it was actually a few years later in the late Seventies) that endears it to me, but I still prefer my type set tightly and I love to throw in an alternate character every now and then. I miss the choices we had for that sort of customization.

Got any favorite Seventies type styles? Chime in and let us know.

Gene Gable has spent a lifetime in publishing, editing and the graphic arts and is currently a technology consultant and writer. He has spoken at events around the world and has written extensively on graphic design, intellectual-property rights, and publishing production in books and for magazines such as Print, U&lc, ID, Macworld, Graphic Exchange, AGI, and The Seybold Report. Gene's interest in graphic design history and letterpress printing resulted in his popular columns "Heavy Metal Madness" and "Scanning Around with Gene" here on CreativePro.com.
  • peteraltschuler says:

    Setting type by hand in the ’70s had nothing to do with the Typositor, which was the first photo typesetting machine whose output was known as cold type. It was hot type — metal letters placed in a form and run through a press — that dominated the industry.

    Letterspacing, linespacing, and the arrangement of words was all done by hand to match an art director’s layout using leading — actual pieces of lead — to get everything just right. Locked in place, printers could run newsprint versions to check alignment and, once approved, “repro” versions on highly calendared paper that could be cut and pasted into camera-ready layouts.

    For body copy, there was the time-consuming process of spec’ing type — getting the font size and line spacing just right to fill fixed dimensions in a layout. Between art directors who sent instructions for type that would be too large — what we called horsey — and those who simply said, “spec to fit,” there was never the proverbial dull moment. Those specs were sent to Linotype operators who turned out “slugs” of type, line by line, which a typesetter then had to arrange and lock on a press bed, just as with display type.

    Digital typesetting might be easier and faster, but the experience of specifying and working with metal type provides a real appreciation for the art of words on paper.

  • >