Shakeups to Adobe Creative Suite 2.3 Cast

When TV shows need a boost, they add new characters with wider audience appeal. See how the software industry is learning this lesson from Tinseltown.
Written by Terri Stone on September 20, 2006
Categories: Features

Related Reading

And you thought Hollywood was rough. Faster than Lindsay Lohan can say "Self destruction," Adobe's Creative Suite has brought in a fresh face, Dreamweaver 8, in preparation for tossing out that ratings loser, GoLive.

The updated Creative Suite will be called version 2.3 and probably will ship in November 2006. By that time, version 8 of Acrobat should be available, so it will replace Acrobat 7 in the Premium suite. The rest of the line-up will remain untouched until next year's Creative Suite 3, which will include major updates to Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign. Creative Suite 2.3 Premium will set you back $1,200 ($160 if you're upgrading from CS2; $550 if you have CS1).

An Inevitable Facelift
No one should be too surprised by the shakeup. Though GoLive (once called CyberStudio) has always been an interesting application, Macromedia's Dreamweaver has long dominated the Web design market. When Adobe swallowed Macromedia last year, it was only a matter of time before Dreamweaver shoved GoLive out of the Creative Suite spotlight. (Insert cry of "Catfight!" here.)

The company says it will continue to develop GoLive as a standalone application. Sounds like relegating a troublesome actor to infomercials to me. My hope is that Adobe radically retools GoLive for Web design beginners. Adobe abandoned that market when it stopped making PageMill, an early WYSIWYG tool that, while easy to use, generated bloated code and couldn't keep up with the Web's fast-growing sophistication.

Acrobat's Had Some Work Done
Last week, product managers of Acrobat 8 and the Creative Suite briefed me on the creative pro-oriented features in version 8. I liked the simplified user interface, which should make this jack-of-all trades app a little easier to manage. The simplicity is especially welcome given the technical nature of some other changes: preflighting tools that now automatically correct problems; expanded PDF/X creation and validation; and JDF validation of InDesign files. It also looks like Acrobat 8 will be better suited to the collaboration and review process, though I have yet to try the beta and be sure.

FreeHand's Looking for a Good Agent
FreeHand has never been part of any version of the Creative Suite, and I don't think that's going to change. Illustrator has the lion's share of the vector drawing market, and besides, it's Adobe's baby, whereas FreeHand is from Macromedia.

Officially, Adobe says it will continue to support FreeHand and develop it "based on our customer's [sic] needs." I'd call that a network executive way of saying that FreeHand is doomed.

1

Love the analogy

Fun analogy of the applications to TV stars.

I agree that Dreamweaver is the big star.

The problem now is that Dreamweaver and Photoshop don't get along backstage the way Photoshop and GoLive did.

No more "Smart Objects" from Photoshop, Illustrator, or Acrobat into Dreamweaver pages.

Worse, Dreamweaver seems to have lost its faithful "little buddy" Fireworks which co-starred with Dreamweaver for many seasons.

This leaves Dreamweaver with an uneasy pairing with Photoshop. Neither application will be terribly happy with the other.

I've been comparing working with Dreamweaver and Photoshop as wearing a sneaker on one foot and a dress shoe on the other. Both are terrific shoes. But they don't look good or work well together.

2

RPinsec does not seem to like the business world :)

Adobe is not killing off its own children. Nothing is dead yet. The kid being sent to the closet is only a foster child. Adobe bought that kid some time ago too.

3

Demise of FreeHand

Adobe had better get Illustrator to play better with Flash before killing off it's half brother FreeHand. (Have you tried pasting a complicated illustration from Illustrator into Flash lately?) I am sticking with FreeHand 11 until that happens.

4

mastodonth

Adobe continues to act like the blind capitalist mastodonth it has become: buying competition, killing its own children, with one single objective: to get to a comfortable monopolistic state and to grab even more of our money

5

What's needed

There are a lot of better and easier choices for the "low end" of the web design market, Softpress Freeway being one (though I don't consider it "low end.")

Adobe would be better off integrating whatever is good about GoLive into DW and being done with it.

Post a Comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <div> <br> <center> <img> <h2>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.