TypeTalk: Five Common Typographic Blind Spots

TypeTalk is a regular blog on typography. Post your questions and comments by clicking on the Comments icon above.
Q. What are the most common typographic blind spots that you come across?
A. Great question, as this gives me an opportunity to get on my typographic soapbox and reinforce some important and useful points.
Ignored OpenType features. OpenType can give designers a lot more features and flexibility, but I find that while most designers have heard of OpenType, and even use it, many are unaware of the powerful features available in some OpenType fonts. True-drawn small caps; oldstyle and lining figures in both tabular and proportional spacing; and a range of ligatures, swashes, ornaments, and alternates can widen your creative horizons and make your work look more professional (Figure 1).
Figure 1. I achieved an elegant, hand-lettered look below with Adobe Bickham Script, which contains lots of swashes, alternates, and flourishes.

Read more about OpenType here:
“Opening Up About OpenType”
“Unplumbed Depths”
“Spot OpenType Fonts Fast”
“What Makes a Font a Pro?”
“Good-looking Figures”
Underused Style Sheets. The paragraph and character styles in InDesign and QuarkXPress let you apply preselected formatting in a single click (Figure 2). Styles are a huge time-saver for repeated formatting, such as headings, subheads, captions, bulleted lists.
Figure 2. I used InDesign’s Character and Paragraph Styles to format the text below.

Many people think that styles (also called style sheets) are too complicated to learn or set up, or not worth it for a relatively brief piece. But these invaluable shortcuts will more than offset the time it takes to set them up, especially when you want to change any formatting across documents. Don’t be scared, just jump in and give them a try!
Read more about styles here:
“The Importance of Style (Sheets)”
Overuse/misuse of tracking and kerning. I’ve often said that today’s page-layout programs give you enough features to hang yourself. This certainly applies to their tracking and kerning features. We should use these features to create more even, readable, and aesthetically pleasing spacing between pairs of characters (kerning) and a range of characters (tracking). Instead, we often use them to force a line to fit where it doesn’t, to “fix” a poor rag, and to bully justified text that probably shouldn’t be justified.
Read more about tracking and kerning here:
“On the Track of Good Type”
“One Good Kern Deserves Another”
“How to Solve Typographic Widows and Orphans”
“Justify My Text”
“Kerning Principles”
“Kerning in Action”
Inattention to alignment. I can’t tell you how many book covers, brochures, headlines, pull quotes, and other display type I see that lack proper optical horizontal and vertical alignment.
While it’s easy to assume your computer will take care of all the details when setting type, software can miss some of the details that make the difference between professional typography and typographic amateur hour (Figure 3).
Figure 3. I set the example on the green background below in 32/35 (32 point type with 35 point leading), but due to the third line set in all caps, the space above that line appears to be much less than between the rest. For the example on the yellow background, I increased the leading of the all-cap line to 42, which is seven points more than the rest.

Brush up on what to look for:
“Vertical Alignment”
“Horizontal Alignment”
“Just Say ‘No’ to Automatic Leading”
Dumb punctuation in onscreen typography. The preponderance of typography in screen-based media, such as motion graphics, movie titles, commercials, video games, and mobile devices, has resulted in some very exciting typography, such as this engaging video of Abbott and Costello’s “Who’s on First?” routine:

Sadly, the use of dumb apostrophes throughout (Figure 4) is a type crime of the highest order!
Figure 4. What are you dumb things doing in a smart skit like this?

The lack of smart quotes and punctuation is a common occurrence in onscreen typography. Whether static or moving, all type should adhere to the basic principles of good typography.
Refresh your awareness of the use of smart quotes and the like here:
“Fast Answers to Font Questions”
… and don’t miss the original routine here:

Love type? Want to know more? Ilene Strizver conducts her acclaimed Gourmet Typography workshops internationally. For more information on attending one or bringing it to your company, organization, or school, go to her site, call The Type Studio at 203-227-5929, or email Ilene at [email protected]. Sign up for her e-newsletter at www.thetypestudio.com.

Ilene Strizver is a noted typographic educator, author, designer and founder of The Type Studio in Westport, Connecticut. Her book, Type Rules! The designer’s guide to professional typography, is now in its 4th edition.
  • Anonymous says:

    I’m sure the links provided have good info… I just don’t have time to click through them all. Was hoping for more info on this page without having to click around… that said, appreciate this article and info and links provided. I may check back to explore links when I have time. Thanks.

  • icem says:

    The spacing demonstration related to the all caps line drove home a point for me, while there are definite rules to good type, there is also an art that is somewhat subjective. While the first example is definitely two tight without adjustment to the All Caps line, in my opinion, the 2nd example adjusted too much when even line color was the goal.

  • Anonymous says:

    I have some people in my organization who still think that you must use two spaces at the end of a sentence. It is not a big deal to do a search and replace in InDesign but how do I convince them that you really, honestly, truly, absolutely should not put two spaces at the end of a sentence (even when you are working in MS Word)?

  • BarryWhiteLLL says:

    I have some people in my organization who still think that you must use two spaces at the end of a sentenc

  • Anonymous says:

    A very interesting and informative article. But…

    The training classes example seems strange to me. First, it’s Century Schoolbook, which has odd relation to leading because of its short decenders. Second, it’s just not an attractive piece of typography, before or after. I can’t imagine it’s use in the real world. Third, it seems like you would choose some text that has decenders above the critical upper case text.

  • Anonymous says:

    Ironically, the type in this article displays incorrectly in Internet Explorer. I posted a blog entry at https://realnumeracy.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!21AFBB7E5EC91E49!745.entry

  • Terri Stone says:

    Yet another reason to love Internet Explorer.

    Seriously, thanks for the head’s up.

    Terri Stone
    Editor in Chief, CreativePro.com

  • >