TypeTalk: Text Fonts versus Display Fonts
TypeTalk is a regular blog on typography. Post your questions and comments by clicking on the Comments icon above. If Ilene answers your question in the blog, you'll receive one Official Creativepro.com T-Shirt!
Q. How can I tell the difference between a text font and a display font? Are there any rules for their use?
A. The bad news is there is no easy, automatic way to tell if a typeface was originally intended for text or display usage. But the good news is no matter what their intended usage, many fonts can be used for both.
Let’s start from the beginning. There are two primary categories of type: text and display. In general, text type is designed to be legible and readable at small sizes. This usually implies fairly clean, consistent, uncomplicated design features; more open spacing than a display face; and thin strokes that hold up at smaller sizes. Display type, on the other hand, can forgo the extreme legibility and readability needed for long blocks of text at small sizes for a stronger personality, elaborate and more expressive shapes, and a more stylish look.
Sometimes they're interchangeable, but not always. Typefaces look different depending on the size at which you view them. Spacing, proportions, and design details change optically. A text face used at large sizes can sometimes look clunky, heavy, and unattractive, and the spacing looks too open. On the other hand, display designs used at small sizes can have design features that break up, disappear, or fill in when viewed small; become less readable; and look too tight.
To avoid unwanted surprises when choosing a typeface, always try to see how it looks at the size(s) you plan on using. It's very difficult to visualize what 14-point text will look like from a 60-point showing, and vice versa. In addition, pay close attention to the spacing, and be prepared to open or close the spacing (tracking) as necessary.
Compare and Contrast:
1. This setting of ITC Bradley Hand looks very natural at the smaller, handwriting size, but looks clunky and unremarkable when set large.
2. ITC Aftershock is dramatic and powerful at display sizes, but its details get muddy and blurred at smaller sizes.
3 and 4. ITC Garamond Condensed and Mark Simonson’s Coquette look great at any size.
Love type? Want to know more? Ilene Strizver conducts her acclaimed Gourmet Typography workshops internationally. For more information on attending one or bringing it to your company, organization, or school, go to her site, call The Type Studio at 203-227-5929, or email Ilene at info@thetypestudio.com. Sign up for her e-newsletter at www.thetypestudio.com.


Comments
sharonc
Thu, 04/17/2008 - 01:29
Permalink
Creating your own font
How can I create my own font? What program is best to use?
Terri Stone
Thu, 04/17/2008 - 13:02
Permalink
Re: Creating your own font
Hi there,
Great topic! But many more people will see your question and have the chance to respond if you post it in the Fonts and Typesetting forum: http://www.creativepro.com/forum/61
Would you mind starting a new forum topic at http://www.creativepro.com/forum/61 ?
Terri Stone
Editor in Chief, CreativePro.com
Thomas Phinney
Fri, 05/30/2008 - 01:22
Permalink
Optical size
I'm surprised to see this piece without some mention and explanation of type families that have fonts cut for different optical sizes. At Adobe, most of our original text fonts are designed and issues this way.
http://www.adobe.com/type/topics/opticalsize.html
for more info.
Regards,
T
Guest (not verified)
Thu, 10/04/2012 - 05:57
Permalink
FONT for display
Is there a good font which can be used to display the info in a scroll box ?